Enzymes market heats up
High feed and energy costs combine to spur sales.
Feed enzyme sales are hot. All manufacturers interviewed report brisk demand over the past year, with 2009
and 2010 expected to usher in even
stronger sales numbers. Enzymes have
gone from being a feed additive only used
occasionally in diets in the United States
“to suddenly become mainstream,” says
John Geuss, director of marketing &
business development for Adisseo.
For the United States, enzymes reached
important market penetration in 2008, Geuss
states, several years later than in Europe. The
reason is that European livestock producers use
more wheat and barley, and vegetable proteins
in their rations, and had more to gain from enzymes historically than US producers, the latter
with their traditional corn, soyabean meal and
animal protein rich diets. But that all changed, he
says, when corn rose from $2 to $8 per bushel,
and fat prices went from their long-term average
of 13 cents per pound to in excess of 30 cents
last year, even though prices have tapered off
from that in recent months.
“Money talks,” Geuss says. “Adisseo used
to say in its Rovabio MAX (combination degrading and phytase enzymes) advertisements that
its enzymes saved $3 per metric ton, but last
year, the saving increased to $9 and now is at
$6 per metric ton, largely due to phosophorus
going from $200 per metric ton to $1,000, before backing off somewhat to $700 per metric
ton by early March 2009,” Geuss says.
Fast growth
For the company AB Vista, the enzyme
and yeast platforms “are growing very fast,”
states Richard Cooper, Managing Director.
One reason for the growth of the company’s
flagship new xylanase product for corn-soya
diets, Cooper says, is that the enzyme is not
destroyed by heating up to 95C. Thus, it can
be put through a commercial pellet press and
can be easily analysed post pelleting. This is
important as more feed companies demand
good quality control, he says. “It is essential that
what we sell reduces feeding cost,” he continues. Cooper indicated that his company has
increased production capacity. “We needed
to increase production to meet the increasing
demand for our enzyme products.”
While the rise in commodity prices has
been an important reason for the enzyme
market taking off, it is not the only factor.
Ingredient quality is also under pressure
as corn and soyabean meal are in shorter
supply and more expensive.
Haley Stomp, product manager for Kemin
North America, says that that with supplies
of corn and soyabean meal under pressure,
livestock producers are motivated to try
other feed ingredients that are less digestible.
Enzymes can help break them down to make
their nutrients available.
Provided by USDA
In this computer generated image, the
red beads highlight the important “active
site” of the phytase molecule. The active
site allows the enzymes to release the
phosphorus from the phytate in feed and
make it available to the animal.
One possibility in using the proper enzyme
formulas is that livestock producers might
be able to use less costly feed ingredients
through substitution, Stomp says, although
carefully balancing a diet is something producers need to work out with their nutritionists.
One area of research for new enzyme products and formulas is in more heat stable products, Stomp says, as there is a trend globally for
more pelleted feed. She notes that while there
have traditionally been two primary methods
to make enzymes more heat stable: through
coating that will allow them to withstand heat or
through genetic manipulation, more innovation
is anticipated in this area.
The proof of the value users of enzymes
have seen in the products improving feed
digestibility, Geuss says, is that even poultry
companies in financial distress and trying
to cut every possible corner are not taking
enzymes out of their rations.
The enzyme market is not only hot in the
Europe and the US, but globally. At present,
some companies interviewed say the fastest-growing market is Asia.
“With increasing commodity prices, there
is no better time to get the most productivity
possible,” says Wendell Knehans, director of
product management for Novus International.
He cites a study by Frost & Sullivan that tracks
the growth in the enzyme market. In 2003, the
global enzyme market was over $200 million,
and was projected to increase by 50% over
a 10-year period. From 2003 to 2008, the
increase was slightly steeper, and is projected
to grow faster in the next five years than the
last five. Looking at specific markets from
2003 to 2008, the US market grew from $53
million to $81 million; China from $42 million to
$71 million; Southeast Asia from $43 million to
$49 million; Europe from $116 million to $159
million; and Australia-New Zealand, from $9
million to $13 million.
Quality ration at lower cost
“Enzymes are becoming more popular,”
Knehans says, for the simple reason that a
higher quality ration can be made at lower
cost, which has become a paramount concern with grain prices so high. Historically,
he says, enzymes have been more popular
in Europe, because without the ease and
convenience of a corn/soyabean meal diet
like producers in the US, “Europeans have
had to be more creative. Their feedstuffs have
not been as digestible.”
The dramatic growth in the global enzyme
market is both good and bad, Geuss says.
Good in that the market is growing but bad
in that it has brought a lot of new competition.
As a result, enzyme prices are under pressure.
“We’ve had to hold on some price increases
we planned to implement in 2008,” Geuss
says. “We’ve had to sharpen our pencils.”
Stomp says with so many new products
and competition in enzymes there must be